How to Conduct a Security Architecture Review

What is a Security Architecture Review?

A Security Architecture Review (SAR) is a structured evaluation of an organization’s security design, ensuring that security controls and technologies are effectively integrated into the overall architecture. The primary goal is to assess whether security mechanisms are designed correctly, implemented effectively, and aligned with industry best practices to protect critical systems and data.

Unlike security operations reviews, which focus on monitoring, incident response, and governance, a Security Architecture Review strictly evaluates the security design of systems, applications, and networks.

---

Why is a Security Architecture Review Required?

Security Architecture Reviews are crucial because they help organizations:

1. Identify Design Weaknesses – Detect architectural flaws that could be exploited.
2. Strengthen Security Posture – Ensure security controls are well-integrated.
3. Ensure Scalability & Resilience – Verify that security mechanisms can handle growth and emerging threats.
4. Reduce Attack Surface – Minimize potential entry points for attackers.
5. Enhance Compliance Readiness – While SARs don’t enforce compliance, they help organizations align with security frameworks (e.g., NIST, CIS, Zero Trust).

---

What Do We Review in a Security Architecture?

A Security Architecture Review focuses on core technical areas where security must be designed and implemented correctly.

1. Network Security

• What to Review:
  • Network segmentation (e.g., VLANs, microsegmentation).
  • Firewall configurations and traffic filtering.
  • Zero Trust Network Architecture (ZTNA).
  • Exposure of critical services to the internet.
• What to Look Out For:
  • Unnecessary open ports/services.
  • Flat network topology allowing lateral movement.
  • Weak or missing firewall rules.

2. Identity & Access Management (IAM)

• What to Review:
  • Authentication mechanisms (MFA, passwordless authentication).
  • Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) & Least Privilege.
  • Privileged Access Management (PAM).
• What to Look Out For:
  • Hardcoded credentials.
  • Overly permissive access rights.
  • Lack of session management.

3. Application Security

• What to Review:
  • Secure Software Development Lifecycle (SSDLC).
  • OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities (SQLi, XSS, etc.).
  • API security (authentication, authorization, rate limiting).
• What to Look Out For:
  • Insecure API endpoints.
  • Hardcoded secrets in source code.
  • Unpatched third-party libraries.

4. Data Security

• What to Review:
  • Data classification and handling.
  • Encryption of data at rest and in transit.
  • Secure data storage mechanisms.
• What to Look Out For:
  • Unencrypted sensitive data.
  • Insecure cloud storage configurations (e.g., public S3 buckets).
  • Unprotected database access.

5. Cloud Security

• What to Review:
  • Cloud Identity & Access Management (IAM).
  • Secure configuration of cloud workloads.
  • Protection of cloud-native services (containers, serverless functions).
• What to Look Out For:
  • Misconfigured cloud storage.
  • Overly permissive IAM policies.
  • Lack of logging/visibility.

6. Endpoint Security

• What to Review:
  • Device hardening (laptops, mobile devices, servers).
  • Patch management and software update policies.
  • Secure baseline configurations (CIS benchmarks).
• What to Look Out For:
  • Outdated/unpatched software.
  • Missing endpoint security controls (EDR, antivirus).
  • Weak disk encryption policies.

---

How to Conduct a Security Architecture Review

Step 1: Define the Scope

Clearly identify the systems and components to be reviewed. Consider factors like:

• Are we reviewing a specific system or enterprise-wide security?
• Is it on-premise, cloud, or hybrid?
• Are we focusing on network, application, or data security?

Step 2: Gather Architectural Documentation

Obtain network diagrams, application architecture, IAM policies, and security configurations from system owners and architects.

Step 3: Assess Security Controls

Compare the current design against security best practices such as:

• NIST Cybersecurity Framework
• CIS Benchmarks
• Zero Trust principles
• Cloud security best practices (AWS Well-Architected Framework, Azure Security Baseline)

Step 4: Identify Gaps & Risks

Document architectural weaknesses and categorize them based on risk severity (e.g., High, Medium, Low).

Step 5: Recommend Security Enhancements

Propose improvements such as:

• Implementing microsegmentation to reduce attack surface.
• Enforcing role-based access control (RBAC) for least privilege.
• Applying encryption for data protection.

Step 6: Validate & Reassess

• Conduct penetration testing or red teaming to validate improvements.
• Schedule periodic reviews to maintain security posture.

---

Key Takeaways

✅ A Security Architecture Review focuses on technical security design, not security operations or compliance.
✅ It evaluates network, IAM, application, data, cloud, and endpoint security to reduce architectural weaknesses.
✅ Security architects should look for misconfigurations, excessive privileges, weak authentication, and lack of encryption.
✅ Follow a structured approach—define scope, gather data, assess security, document risks, recommend solutions, and validate improvements.

By refining security architecture continuously, organizations can ensure their defenses are strong, scalable, and aligned with evolving cyber threats. 🚀